Gail Ruhl, Interim P&PDL Director/Senior
Plant Disease Diagnostician
The staff of the Plant and Pest
Diagnostic Lab, along with other cooperating Extension Specialists
in the Departments of Botany and Plant Pathology, Agronomy, Entomology,
and Horticulture diagnosed a total of 1604 routine samples in
2004 (Table 1).
Of
the 1604 routine sample submissions to the P&PDL, 1533
were submitted as physical samples, 16 were submitted as digital
images accompanied by physical samples and 55 were submitted
strictly as electronic submissions of digital images via a standard
web-based method made available in 2003 to all Indiana educators
as well as the general public.
Of
the 71 total electronic ‘samples’ submitted,
42 digital images were submitted by County Extension Educators
for various clientele while 29 were submitted directly by the
general public (e.g. homeowners, garden centers, greenhouses,
landscapers, dealer/industry reps). Electronic submission of
a digital sample to the Plant and Pest Diagnostic Lab was assessed
the same $11 (in-state) and $22 (out-of-state) charge as a physical
sample. There was no additional charge for follow-up physical
samples requested by diagnosticians who desired more detail for
an accurate identification or problem diagnosis than was provided
by the initial digital images submitted.
The
majority of routine samples were received by the P&PDL
during the months of June, July, and August (Figure
1). Same day service was provided for 5% of the
samples received during 2004 and 28% of the samples were completed
in three days or less. A total of 50% of the samples received
during 2004 were diagnosed within five working days and 80% of
all samples received were answered within 10 working days. An
extended turn-around time of greater than 10 days (20% of samples)
was documented for those samples requiring more extensive culture
work and laboratory testing (Figure
2).
Noninfectious disorders (42%), infectious diseases (35%), and
arthropod-related problems (14%) were the most common primary
diagnoses in 2004 (Figure
3). The most common commodities submitted to the
P&PDL were ornamentals (58%), followed by agronomic crops
(18%), insect infestation/ID (7%) and turfgrass/yard (7%) (Figure
4). The remaining 15% of samples were distributed
among various other commodity groups including vegetables, fruit,
specialty crops and insect infestation/ID. Specific commodity
related summaries of prevalent problems that occurred in
2003 were provided by Purdue Extension Specialists and Research
Associates.
The
Plant and Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, serves as the plant
disease diagnostic facility for the IDNR and thus the expertise
of P&PDL plant disease diagnosticians is an integral part
of the regulatory function performed by the Indiana Department
of Natural Resources (IDNR). The IDNR and the Purdue Plant and
Pest Diagnostic Laboratory worked together to survey nurseries
in the state of Indiana for the presence of Phytophthora
ramorum, the causal agent of Sudden Oak Death. P. ramorum was
isolated in June 2000 from dying trees in California. Since its
discovery in North America, P. ramorum has been confirmed
in forests in California and Oregon and in nurseries in California,
Oregon, Washington and British Columbia. There are programs addressing Phytophthora
ramorum in forests settings and in production nurseries.
On March 8, 2004, Claude R. Knighten, Public Affairs Specialist
for USDA/APHIS
Plant Protection and Quarantine, reported the confirmation
of Phytophthora ramorum, the fungus-like causal organism
of sudden oak death (SOD) disease on six varieties of camellia
samples taken from Monrovia Nursery, in Azusa, California. Hosts
and associated plants were destroyed. As of December 2004, 21
states reported positive confirmations of Phytophthora ramorum,
the fungus-like causal agent of Sudden Oak Death, on nursery
stock originating from a large nursery in southern California
and a nursery in Oregon. Indiana established an Emergency Quarantine
of California nursery stock susceptible to Sudden Oak Death on
March 30, 2004. Twenty nurseries were surveyed, and the 871 samples
submitted all tested negative for P. ramorum.
The
P&PDL provided disease diagnosis on 97 corn and 6 soybean
fields for the IDNR Phytosanitary Certification Program as well
as disease diagnosis on 57 corn field samples for entry into
the National
Agricultural Plant Information System (NAPIS) database. |